Stereotactic Radiosurgery Errors and Problems

There’s a saying that sometimes the cure is worse than the disease. For more than a few stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) patients around the country, the cure may have turned out to be more devastating than the disease. One of the many scary facts of the SRS cases is that the post-surgery injuries took months to manifest, so a nationwide warning went out after perhaps thousands of patients had undergone the procedure.
SRS involves fairly new radiation technology, and it’s quickly gained in popularity. In the old days, even a small brain tumor or spinal cord injury required high-risk, complicated surgery. The risk of injuring healthy tissue weighed on every patient’s and surgeon’s mind as they discussed the procedure.
SRS, on the other hand, allows pinpoint accuracy in the delivery of large, highly concentrated doses of radiation. The device that can achieve this kind of precision is the Gamma Knife, but the Gamma Knife runs on radioactive material and generates radioactive waste. A linear accelerator, the device most commonly used in SRS, generates radiation without using radioactive materials. Safer for the surgical team, cheaper for the hospital — the linear accelerator looks like the way to go.
However, according to research conducted by the New York Times and many injury attorneys in Naples, FL, many of the linear accelerators used in SRS have been adapted from models used in standard radiation therapy. More experience with the retrofitted devices led to further enhancements, but the piling on of electronic parts resulted in components not being able to communicate with other components. One critic called it a “mix and match treatment delivery system” — a delivery system that made serious surgical errors possible, even when the manufacturer’s instructions were followed.

At Fault in an Auto Crash

Fault in an auto crash is usually dependent on the state where the injury happened. State laws change significantly, therefore it is vital that you make contact with a skilled attorney to decide if the state has a fault or no- fault.

Fault states: In a fault-based system, insurance providers pay according to the measure of fault of every party.

No-Fault States: As the tort (suit) system has resulted in a lot of long and expensive court battles over who was responsible and to what degree, policymakers in many states shifted from a fault-based system to some sort of a no-fault system.

Under no-fault automobile insurance laws, the motorist that is great will not need to show the crash was the fault of somebody else before getting damages. His insurance carrier picks up rehabilitation costs, medical debts and lost wages up to the quantity spent. The tradeoff is the other motorist is sued by the wounded man cannot for pain and suffering, mental distress and annoyance. (In case your home is in a no-fault state, the no-fault part of your car insurance policy is generally called PIP or personal injury protection.)

    • Florida
    • Hawaii
    • Kansas
    • Kentucky
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Minnesota
    • Pennsylvania
    • Utah

Other factors come into play if you got a DUI in Tacoma, WA.

Unlike damages for bodily injury claims, insurance claims continue to be according to fault, in regards to physical harm to your own vehicle or its contents. Those claims are handled in exactly the same manner as those in a state having a fault law: looking for your personal collision insurance or by filing a suit from the poor driver.

Suits, nevertheless, are allowed for harms matching with a specific threshold, the meaning of which varies greatly on the list of no-fault PIP states. An injured person can sue whether the claim exceeds either a financial or verbal (illustrative) brink. In financial threshold states (see below), medical expenses have to be over a specific dollar amount. In verbal (illustrative) brink PIP states (see below), harms should be comparatively intense (major loss of use of body part, disfigurement, permanent impairment, bone fracture) or conveyed in relation to duration of impairment (total handicap over 180 days). Some states have if he meets either one, both, where case an injured person has the ability to file a liability claim.

Due to the different hybrid vehicles in the PIP packaging, whether it is possible to file an injury liability claim actually depends on the details of your state’s no-fault auto law. Your best first task would be to get in touch with an auto crash lawyer to discuss the way the applicable state law looks at fault and the way your right to recoup damages changes.

In Contact After an Adoption

A concept to delivery Parents, Adoptive Parents, and Adoptees:

I’ve been contacted with many of you lately around hunting for a potential reunion as well as relatives. The registry is the primary area you need to assess. The State won’t, nevertheless, allow you to find your arrival relatives, even though they’ve enrolled. Your birth relatives will simply suggest you whether arrival relatives or adoptees have registered addresses and their names, so they can be located by you.

To get a base payment of $500, I am going to recover your file from its safe storage services; evaluation the file to find out in case your arrival relatives consented to some release of the identifying info; and I’ll a satisfy together with you to go over your alternatives, search or contact by means of your birth family. We may have to engage a detective agency if you choose to go looking for the birth family. This will be yet another cost. We discover most arrival relatives don’t reside during the period of the adoption in the tackle in the file.

We do have added way of seeking for the arrival relatives, including court proceedings to open the Broward child adoption file that is first. We can talk about prices and these alternatives in our assembly. I’m easing reunions and these investigations in a reduced-fee because I would like to make relatives affordable for all and I consider they work-out really properly in many cases.

I anticipate hearing from you.

Links Between Texting and Driving and Danger

More focus and scientific research is proving that preoccupied driving behavior leads to injuries and fatalities across U.S. roadways. Using cell phones while driving have become the center of attention for public health efforts and public debate because using cell phones while driving has become so common and texting. Based on National Traffic Highway Safety Administration, through the day almost 660,000 motorists are using their cell phones while driving. Campaigns urging motorists to put down their cell phones also to concentrate on simply driving are being brought to the forefront by cell phone carriers, car manufacturers, vehicle insurance providers, public health organizations and more. However while the messages of texting while driving are common and motorists have become more alert to the dangers connected with using cellphones and texting behind the wheel, behavior are not necessarily revealing any change. Especially as it pertains to the youngest drivers, the newly licensed and inexperienced teenage drivers in the nation.  Many result in accidents that take experienced  deerfield beach accident lawyers to handle.

A survey performed by the AAA Foundation in conjunction with Seventeen magazine found that 94 percent of teen drivers know that texting while driving is not safe. Nevertheless, even with such a higher percentage of adolescents knowing the dangers, 35 percent of teenagers still text behind the wheel. While the recently licensed motorists were more prone to put down the phone when driving, mature teenaged motorists were grown with by the speeds of texting while driving. The USA government’s website states that 11 percent of drivers between 18-20 were sending or receiving text messages when involved in a car accident.

“We represent people who have been injured by distracted drivers, and feel it’s significant our company help raise awareness in spreading the message of the dangers of teen distracted driving.”

Together with these other organizations are creating positive change by raising awareness of the risks of texting while driving. Each of these organizations has programs and helpful hints on their websites on your adolescent as well as to help prevent distracted driving customs for you:

Understanding Driver and Passenger Fourth Amendment Rights

Constitution_We_the_PeopleThe Fourth Amendment to the Constitution necessitates that searches and seizures be reasonable, and warrants should be based on probable cause. State actors such as the police are hence required to show probable cause before seizing a person. This is applicable to when a police is stopping a driver and the passenger. Therefore, it is unconstitutional to seize a driver or a passenger if there is no probable cause that the driver or the passenger was involved in wrongdoing during the time of the stop.

When you are in the car it is more rational that you are not completely out in public, but you are away from your home and in a plain view of the general public, police and other by-standers. Due to this fact the right of the fourth amendment is not absolute when it comes to seizing and searching cars. In various occasions, the courts have pointed out that when one is in the car there is a lack of privacy. It is due to this facts that the fourth amendment rights might not be applicable in some occasions.

The fourth amendment right to the driver and passenger during a police stop is valid when a driver is pulled over for a minor traffic infraction. The police officer will only have the right to search the car if he possess a valid search warrant, valid arrest warrant, and a belief of probable cause’ that the driver or the passenger has committed a crime. When one is arrested due to a traffic violation, the police have no mandate to search the car. The police can only search a vehicle after an arrest of a recent occupant unless the police officers have unreasonable doubt that the evidence of an offense is in the car. Contrary to this, it is a violation of the fourth amendment.

If the police find probable cause that a car is transporting illicit items such as drugs they are only required to produce a search warrant if the car is stationary. A search will be permissible without a search warrant if the car is moving. The rationale behind this is the fact that the car can drive off and evidence can be lost before the police secure a search warrant. The fourth amendment right is not therefore violated if the police have unreasonable doubt that a moving car possess illegal goods.

The fourth amendment right does not prevent any warrant less searches of personal belonging of passengers in a car that has been legally stopped. Passengers are in close proximity to the driver and can engage in joint activities that can cover evidence or items that could put police officer’s safety at risk. Therefore, the police have the mandate to order the passengers out the car. Lawmakers and courts have ensured that there are legal safeguards that law enforcement officers can only interfere with person’s fourth amendment under a particular circumstance.

5 Common Mistakes Made By The Police During a DUI Arrest

florida-65866_640After a DUI arrest, your first step is to hire an attorney, but how do they challenge the state’s case against you? Well there can be a number of defenses that an attorney will work towards, however it is most common to find an error made by the arresting officer to help win a DUI case. There are numerous process that must be followed from the time the officer turns on his lights to the final moment of the arrest when you are handed over to corrections. With the help of a DUI attorney in Orlando, we broke down the 5 most common mistakes made by police during a DUI arrest.

The Officer Writes a Poor Report

Whether it’s because of poor note taking or a lack of intellectual capacity or whether they wait to long to do it or whether its the fact that they don’t accurately take the information down as it occurs, this is the number one mistake officers make. A good DUI attorney will explore these issues and and often times win DMV hearings and court cases as a result.

Improper Collection of Evidence at the Scene

Officers almost never interview passengers in car who could establish a drinking timeline. They may have a different story than the driver, thus creating inconsistencies which can be used to the driver’s advantage. They also fail to look in the car for evidence, open containers things of that nature that would be useful information.

Improper Collection of Chemical Tested Evidence

In order for a test to be validated there needs to be a 15 min observation period where the officer observes the defendant. Often times these chemical tests are being taken at a station and when the officers get to the station or jail they have to secure their weapons which they do before they take the defendant out. With the defendant in the car, the officer no longer sees him, the trunk is blocking him. they take about a minute to secure the weapons then they walk them right into the jail and the chemical test will take about 10 minutes to happen, so we have a break in that 15 min window which makes it a violation. if that can be shown in testimony, it shifts the burden back to the department of motor vehicles. When that happens they now have to call upon an expert to fix that problem and they never want to have to call experts.

The Officer Fails to Properly Collect Blood Evidence

After you get taken to the station. the officer is usually not really watching what the nurse is doing and rather filling out paperwork. Most attorneys know this and will cross examine the arresting officer and ask them what the nurse did after the test. What they miss by not paying attention is the inversion of the blood vile so that the preservative mixes properly with the blood. When no inversion takes place fermentation occurs and can be used to the defendants advantage.

Conduct Non-Standardized Field Sobriety Tests

Officers have basic training in this, but often times they improperly instruct and demonstrate and actually record how the person performs the test. There are 3 standardized field sobriety tests, but many officers do not have a good understanding of these. Instead they use the finger count test or finger to nose test, but these are subjective there is no way to really quantify performance. They also do a poor job of picking good location for the test and they normally don’t factor in fatigue or physical abnormality. This is one of the most fertile areas  of cross examination, significantly helping a lawyer win their clients case at a hearing or in court.


If I Receive a Ticket, Does That Mean the Accident is My Fault

While millions of claims are filed each year, not all of them result in tickets. Even if you did not receive a ticket, you may be at fault for the accident. One of the most common concerns people have when getting into an automobile accident is receiving a ticket. Individuals who are looking to file an accident report may become apprehensive. Generally speaking, a ticket from an accident will go on the accident report and can result in points being added to one’s driver’s license.

When Is a Ticket Issued?

Tickets are typically only issued after a thorough investigation of the causes of the accident. After interviewing witnesses, evaluating traffic conditions, and studying the positions of the vehicles, the officer will then make a judgement as to whether or not a traffic ticket should be issued. If the officer has found that a driver has violated a traffic law, then most likely the insurance company will agree with the officer that the responsibility of the accident belongs to the driver to whom the ticket was issued. However, this applies only if negligence is the reason for the accident occurring in the first place. Sometimes, both drivers in an accident have been cited for violations of traffic laws.


Wrongly Issued Tickets
Many have been wrongly issued citations for moving violations for which they were not responsible. In this case, the defendant of a traffic ticket should fight the ticket. Hire an attorney and plead not guilty when the ticket goes to traffic court. There is a great deal of circumstantial evidence often required in order for there to be a solid proof of the factors which contributed to the damage to the other vehicle. Also, insurance companies are not willing to pay for claims without investigating the cause of the accident first. Keep in mind that the officer whom issued the citation must testify in court, and there must be direct evidence which would put a driver at fault for an accident. Tickets are not always issued justly, so there are plenty of reasons in which they can be contested in court. Thus, it is usually worth the extra time and hassle to fight a ticket in court which comes as a direct response to an accident.